BODY SHAPE

What is your body shape and how common is it?

Body shape classification has been used in fashion, epidemiology, and health research for decades. The five main shapes vary significantly in population prevalence by sex. Whether you have a tape measure or not, answer the questions below to find your shape and see where it sits in the data.

NHANES 2017-2020, NCHS Data Brief No. 508 · WHO Waist-Hip Ratio Technical Report (2008)
Advertisement
Route A: Measurements
cm
cm
cm
yrs
Route B: Descriptive
Wider than my hips
About the same width
Narrower than my hips
Clearly defined (noticeably narrower than hips and chest)
Slightly defined
Not very defined (similar to my hips and chest)
Middle (abdomen)
Hips and thighs
Equally distributed
Upper body (chest, back)
Calculating your result...
BODY SHAPE QUIZ
YOUR RESULT
percentile

1st 50th 99th
find the norm
FINDTHENORM.COM

What are the five body shapes?

The five commonly recognised body shapes are: Apple (weight concentrated around the abdomen, prevalent in 55-60% of women and 50-55% of men), Pear (hips wider than waist, weight in lower body, approximately 20-25% of women and 15% of men), Hourglass (well-defined waist with similar hip and shoulder width, approximately 8-10% of women and 3% of men), Rectangle (similar width throughout with less waist definition, approximately 15-20% of women and 25-30% of men), and Inverted Triangle (shoulders noticeably wider than hips, approximately 5% of women and 5-10% of men).

Apple shape prevalence has increased in most high-income countries over the past four decades, tracking increases in central body composition that are associated with metabolic changes. This makes it the most statistically common shape in current adult populations, particularly for older adults.

What is waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and how is it calculated?

Waist-to-hip ratio is calculated by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference: a waist of 80cm and hips of 100cm gives a WHR of 0.80. The WHO uses WHR as a population-level screening tool for central adiposity risk. For women, WHR above 0.85 and for men above 0.90 are the WHO thresholds associated with substantially increased metabolic risk in population studies. Median WHR in NHANES 2017-2020 was 0.83 for women and 0.94 for men.

Is WHR a better health indicator than BMI?

Research suggests WHR and waist circumference may predict cardiovascular and metabolic risk more accurately than BMI in population studies, primarily because they capture central body composition rather than overall weight. BMI does not distinguish between muscle, bone, and body composition, and fails to capture how weight is distributed. However, no single anthropometric measurement is a reliable individual health diagnostic. All these measures are population-level tools, and a single measurement should never be used to make clinical health judgements about an individual.

Advertisement

Frequently asked questions

Apple shape is the most prevalent body shape among adult women in high-income countries, estimated at 55-60% in NHANES data. This represents a shift from previous decades: in the 1960s and 1970s, rectangular and pear shapes were more prevalent. The increase in apple prevalence tracks trends in central body composition that have occurred in most high-income populations over the same period. Among younger women (18-35), pear and hourglass shapes are more common relative to older cohorts, as central body composition distribution tends to increase with age.

Yes, significantly. Hormonal changes across the lifespan alter where the body stores composition. Women typically experience a redistribution from lower-body to central composition after menopause, driven by declining oestrogen levels. Men also tend to accumulate more central composition with age. This means many people who identify as pear or hourglass shaped in their 20s and 30s find their shape shifts toward rectangular or apple by their 50s and 60s. Resistance training and maintaining muscle mass with age can partially counteract this redistribution.

The WHO recommends measuring waist circumference at the midpoint between the lower rib and the top of the hip bone (iliac crest), typically level with the navel. The measurement should be taken at the end of a normal breath out, with the tape horizontal and snug but not compressing the skin. Common errors include measuring at the narrowest point (which is lower for some body types and higher for others), pulling the tape tight, or measuring over clothing. Hip circumference is measured at the widest point of the hips, typically at the level of the greater trochanter (the bony protrusion of the hip joint).

The WHO's 2008 technical report on waist circumference and waist-hip ratio sets elevated risk thresholds at WHR above 0.90 for men and above 0.85 for women, and substantially elevated risk at WHR above 0.95 for men and above 0.90 for women. These thresholds were established based on population studies showing associations with type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic syndrome. It is important to note that these are population-level screening thresholds, not individual diagnostic criteria. Many people above these thresholds have no metabolic issues, and many below them do. The WHO specifically states that WHR should be used in conjunction with other clinical information, not in isolation.

Fashion and style guides have long used body shape as a framework for clothing recommendations, aiming to create visual balance. The general principles are: pear shapes are typically advised to balance the lower body with more structured or detailed upper-body garments; inverted triangles to balance wide shoulders with fuller skirts or wider-leg trousers; rectangles to create the appearance of waist definition with belts or fit-and-flare silhouettes; hourglasses to emphasise the waist with fitted styles; and apple shapes to draw attention upward and use flowing fabrics through the midsection. These are guidelines rather than rules, and fit and personal style preferences should always take precedence over body-shape-based prescriptions.

Advertisement
Data sources
  • NHANES 2017-2020, NCHS Data Brief No. 508, WHR distribution by sex and age in US adults
  • WHO. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation. Geneva 2008.
  • Cash TF et al. Body Shape Assessment Scale. Body Image journal. 2004.
  • Ashwell M, Hsieh SD. Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2005.
Reviewed by Find The Norm Research Team · · Methodology